Many people who arrive at therapy for narcissistic abuse do not know yet whether what they experienced "counts". They have read forums, watched videos, listened to podcasts that describe a pattern that fits exactly, and they are still uncertain whether it was that, or whether they were the difficult one, or whether they imagined the worst of it.
If that is where you are reading this from, I want to say something first. The fact that you are still asking the question is not evidence against the answer. The pattern is built to keep you doubting.
This piece describes what therapy after this kind of relationship can and cannot do, and what you can expect if we work together.
What "narcissistic abuse" actually describes
The phrase has become common in popular discussion, less common in formal clinical writing. The reason is partly that "narcissist" as a diagnostic claim about another person is not something a therapist can confidently make about someone they have not assessed. The work of recovery does not depend on what the other person was technically diagnosable with. It depends on what was done, repeatedly, and what it left behind in you.
In clinical language, what people most often mean by narcissistic abuse is a pattern of coercive control characterised by some combination of these:[1]
These patterns occur across all genders, all sexualities, all kinds of relationship: romantic, family, work. The intensity varies. The mechanism is similar: your sense of self is repeatedly destabilised by another person's pattern of behaviour.
What it tends to leave behind
The aftermath of this kind of relationship has a recognisable shape, and most of it is not neurotic. It is appropriate, given what happened.
You may find yourself second-guessing perceptions other people would treat as straightforward. You may be hypervigilant in new relationships in ways that feel disproportionate but make sense if you trace them back. You may have lost touch with your own emotional landscape: years of being told what you were and were not feeling will do that. You may notice patterns of self-blame and apology that no longer fit current circumstances. You may struggle with trust, particularly in close relationships. The body-level fragments of the worst moments may surface as PTSD-shaped responses: hyperarousal, intrusive memories, dissociation, sleep disturbance.[3]
None of this is evidence that something was wrong with you all along. It is evidence that you were exposed, repeatedly, to something that human nervous systems are not designed to absorb without consequence.
What recovery work tends to look like
Recovery from this kind of relationship is rarely fast. The work has phases.
Stabilisation comes first. Before anything else, the priority is restoring basic functioning: sleep, regular eating, movement, contact with safe people, distance from the relationship's reach. We do not move toward processing the trauma material until the present is stable enough to hold the work.
Trauma processing follows. This is where modalities like EMDR, schema therapy, and trauma-focused CBT come in. Specific events that hold disproportionate weight are revisited in a structured way that allows the body to update what it learnt at the time.
Identity rebuilding runs throughout and continues afterwards. Who were you before. Who do you want to be now. What actually belongs to you and what was inserted. New relational templates take time to take root.
How long the work lasts depends on the duration and intensity of the relationship, what other resources you have, what other adversity has been around it, and what you are bringing the work toward. A year of regular sessions is not unusual. Some people find six months is enough. Some need longer.
How I work in this territory
I draw on several modalities here. Schema therapy[5] is unusually well-suited to this work, particularly for the longstanding relational templates that may have made you vulnerable to the dynamic in the first place and that the dynamic then deepened. EMDR[4] is useful for specific traumatic memories and body-stored fragments. Trauma-focused CBT can help where panic, avoidance, or specific phobic responses are in play. Person-centred work runs underneath, because at the core of this kind of recovery is being heard accurately, possibly for the first time in years.
Sessions are fifty minutes, weekly or fortnightly, online via Microsoft Teams or in person at Bayswater or Chancery Lane in central London.
When therapy is not the right starting point
This kind of work assumes you are out of the immediate harm or in a position to make decisions about it. If you are still in the relationship and there is ongoing risk to your safety, the right first contacts are the National Domestic Abuse Helpline (0808 2000 247, free, confidential, 24 hours), Women's Aid, or Men's Advice Line. They can help with practical safety planning in a way I cannot.
If your primary current need is legal (divorce, separation, child arrangements, protective orders), a solicitor before a therapist often makes more sense. Therapy can run alongside, but it is not a substitute for the legal process.
If you are very recently out of the relationship and finding it hard to function day to day, a brief period of stabilisation work with a crisis-trained therapist may be a better immediate match than the deeper trauma processing that schema- or EMDR-based work does well.
How to start
If something here describes your experience and you would like to talk through whether we might be a good fit, the first step is a free ten-minute consultation. I am currently waitlisted, with new clients from 1 August 2026.
References